Librarian by Day Bobbi Newman | I'm not that kind of librarian

The Only Thing This Video Proves is 3 Year Olds Can Be Coached

03.02.2010 · Posted in Libraries, Video

There is a video making the rounds in libraryland of a very cute 3 year old named Abby talking about what she wants from her library. If you haven’t seen it, I’ve embedded it below. I saw it when it first started making the rounds and thought cute, but clearly that child has been coached and so dismissed it. She isn’t telling us what she wants, she telling us what the person behind the camera told her to say. She is three,  she has no idea what she is saying.

But then it started to be retweeted, and librarians started holding it up as proof of something. Of proof we need to adapt and change for digital natives. Then I started beating my head against my desk. Because please, anyone can see this child is coached and this, THIS is your proof? If you showed this to me as proof your stance in an argument I would mock you. And you would deserve it.

I don’t argue that we need to change it is why I work so hard on the transliteracy issue, it’s why I started the blog. The struggle to incorporate new technology into libraries is well documented from both sides of the fray. This is an incredibly important issue. If we’re going to discuss it we need well founded arguments not props. Get a study, get anecdotes from adults who know what they are saying, get stats. (email me if you need these I have PILES of reports and pages of bookmarks in delicious)

But please, I ask you, no I implore you, do NOT use this video as proof of anything other than three-year old girls named Abby are freaking adorable.


Similar Posts:

Use Facebook to Comment on this Post

21 Responses to “The Only Thing This Video Proves is 3 Year Olds Can Be Coached”

  1. “But then it started to be retweeted, and librarians started holding it up as proof of something.” You are kidding right? All i saw was people tweeting how cute it was. I must be following the wrong (right) people on twitter.

  2. Robin Cicchetti says:

    Bravo! Couldn't agree more. I was actually a little horrified.

  3. jimmythegeek says:

    Why yes, three-year-old girls are freaking adorable! I have one myself!

  4. Yes, I am with you there. (I asked my three-year-old what she wants in a library. She said, “yittle tiny fish”.)

  5. YouTube videos are serious business.

  6. This just reminded me of the Will Ferrell landlord sketch (there may be hilarious adult language by a baby): http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/74/the-landlor

    I agree that a baby taking direction doesn't prove anything. Small children can be pretty humorous or cute, but it seems a little like their being exploited.

  7. I like reading your blog (in fact I follow your posts!) but I don´t agree with you regarding this video (by the way, I've posted it in my blog…). This cute girl was, no doubt, coached, she even doesn´t understand what she's saying. It was a kind of 'marketing' operation on VALA (http://www.vala.org.au/index.php) Conference 2010. The issues are critical and make us think about…

    • Angelina – I absolutely agree that these issues are critical and we need to be thinking about them. But there are so many real world, fact based ways we can demonstrate this and start discussions. It makes me cringe to see us holding up something that can so easily be dismissed as fabricated. which would allow the issues to then be dismissed as well.

      • angelina says:

        Ok, Bobbi. I agree with your point of view but again I'm in favor of this video just because I 'see' it as a marketing product and because it's well done (and the girl is so cute, and so on) it can act in favour of our school libaries…It's my humble opinion..

        • colleengreene says:

          I too simply saw this as simply a marketing ploy to get people to think. I'd say their P.R. team did a good job, considering how much we're talking about it, regardless of what we say think it. I can't imagine anyone actually pointing to this as proof, and haven't heard that done.

          I did use the video in a presentation on Tuesday, to a group of mostly older special collections librarians and older museum/archive/local history volunteers. The topic was using the social web to promote and provide access to special collections. Most of these organizations are still working with static HTML-based websites, and are in no way poised to make their content accessible in a Web 2.0, much less 3.0, environment. My job was to help them understand why migrating to dynamically-driven web-based content is so critical, and why it will become even more critical in order to stay relevant to younger patrons.

          I started off the discussion by pointing out that this video was obviously fabricated, that it simply, creatively, and humorously raises ideas these organizations need to become aware of if they want their collections to become more accessible to younger generations of researchers.

          And the illustration worked. We devoted quite a bit of Q&A time afterward, discussing terms and ideas raised by the video (most of these concepts were quite foreign to my audience). It was my job to answer these questions and provide more credible data as “proof”. This video simply got my audience thinking.

          • Colleen I’m glad you were able to use it in a successful way.

            My concern is that people are pointing to it was real evidence of something. I also think that the same points could have been made in another way that was not fabricated and have had the same effect.

          • Colleen I’m glad you were able to use it in a successful way.
            My concern is that people are pointing to it was real evidence of something. I also think that the same points could have been made in another way that was not fabricated and have had the same effect.

    • Angelina – I absolutely agree that these issues are critical and we need to be thinking about them. But there are so many real world, fact based ways we can demonstrate this and start discussions. It makes me cringe to see us holding up something that can so easily be dismissed as fabricated. which would allow the issues to then be dismissed as well.

  8. I read about the controversy behind the video over at Agnostic Maybe. I thought everyone knew this was coached and that it was just a cute example. I read that people were unlinking from it like it was some hoax. If people are that gullible about something online, especially librarians, there is a lot of work to be done.

    • I'm not sure they are gullible, but I think in some cases we are so desperate for “proof” we'll grasp at anything, we just need to be careful. It would be horrible to destroy the progress we've made in the name of cuteness.

  9. wandaedwards says:

    Thank you! Thank you! My thoughts exactly (except mine included cursing and rants about child abuse).

  10. [...] Bobbi L. Newman from Librarian By Day comments on the Digital Native video I had posted a while ago. [...]

Leave a Reply